MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789701473 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aaaa95

Evaluation of <sup>209</sup> At as a theranostic isotope for <sup>209</sup> At-radiopharmaceutical development using high-energy SPECT

2018· article· en· W2789701473 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason R. Crawford, Andrew K. H. Robertson, Hua Yang, Cristina Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, Pedro L. Esquinas, P. Kunz, Stephan Blinder, Vesna Sossi, Paul Schaffer, T.J. Ruth

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of VictoriaTRIUMF
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanada Foundation for InnovationTRIUMF
KeywordsImaging phantomCollimatorIsotopeBiodistributionMonte Carlo methodPhysicsImage resolutionNuclear medicinePhotonMaterials scienceRadiochemistryOpticsNuclear physicsIn vivoChemistryMedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The development of alpha-emitting radiopharmaceuticals using 211 At requires quantitative determination of the time-dependent nature of the 211 At biodistribution. However, imaging-based methods for acquiring this information with 211 At have not found wide-spread use because of its low abundance of decay emissions suitable for external detection. In this publication we demonstrate the theranostic abilities of the 211 At/ 209 At isotope pair and present the first-ever 209 At SPECT images. The VECTor microSPECT/PET/CT scanner was used to image 209 At with a collimator suitable for the 511 keV annihilation photons of PET isotopes. Data from distinct photopeaks of the 209 At energy spectrum (195 keV (22.6%), 239 keV (12.4 %), 545 keV (91.0 %), a combined 782/790 keV peak (147 %), and 209 Po x-rays (139.0 %)) were independently evaluated for use in image reconstructions using Monte Carlo (GATE) simulations and phantom studies. 209 At-imaging in vivo was demonstrated in a healthy mouse injected with 10 MBq of free [ 209 At]astatide. Image-based measurements of 209 At uptake in organs of interest—acquired in 5 min intervals—were compared to ex vivo gamma counter measurements of the same organs. Simulated and measured data indicated that—due to the large amount of scatter from high energy (&gt;750 keV) gammas—reconstructed images using the x-ray peak outperformed those obtained from other peaks in terms of image uniformity and spatial resolution, determined to be &lt;0.85 mm. 209 At imaging using the x-ray peak revealed a biodistribution that matched the known distribution of free astatide, and in vivo image-based measurements of 209 At uptake in organs of interest matched ex vivo measurements within 10%. We have acquired the first 209 At SPECT images and demonstrated the ability of quantitative SPECT imaging with 209 At to accurately determine astatine biodistributions with high spatial and temporal resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.331
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207