Transcriptional profiling of male CD-1 mouse lungs and Harderian glands supports the involvement of calcium signaling in acrylamide-induced tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acrylamide (AA) exposure causes increased incidence of forestomach, lung, and Harderian gland tumors in male mice. One hypothesized mode of action (MOA) for AA-carcinogenicity includes genotoxicity/mutagenicity as a key event, possibly resulting from AA metabolism to the direct genotoxic metabolite glycidamide. Alternatively, altered calcium signaling (CS) has been proposed as a central key event in the MOA. To examine the plausibility of these proposed MOAs, RNA-sequencing was performed on tumor target tissues: Harderian glands (the most sensitive tumor target tissue in the rodent 2-year cancer bioassay) and lungs of AA-exposed male CD-1 mice. Animals were exposed to 0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, or 24.0 mg AA/kg bw-day in drinking water for 5, 15, or 31 days. We observed a pronounced effect on genes involved in CS and cytoskeletal processes in both tissues, but no evidence supporting a genotoxic MOA. Benchmark dose modeling suggests transcriptional points of departure (PODs) of 0.54 and 2.21 mg/kg bw-day for the Harderian glands and lungs, respectively. These are concordant with PODs of 0.17 and 1.27 mg/kg bw-day derived from the cancer bioassay data for these tissues in male mice, respectively. Overall, this study supports the involvement of CS in AA-induced mouse carcinogenicity, which is consistent with a recently proposed CS-based MOA in rat thyroid, and with other published reports of aberrant CS in malignant tumors in rodents and humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".