MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2789731359 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.069

A69 THE MOLECULAR LANDSCAPE IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS

2018· article· en· W2789731359 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katelynn S. Madill-Thomsen, Vojislav Jovanović, Jeffery M. Venner, Konrad S. Famulski, Simone Withecomb, Miles Parkes, Aducio Thiesen, Richard Fedorak, Philip F. Halloran, Brendan P. Halloran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUlcerative colitisInflammasomeImmunologyGene chip analysisBiologyGeneMicroarrayMedicineGene expressionCancer researchDiseaseInflammationPathologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic, idiopathic inflammatory condition affecting the colonic epithelium, with the inflammasome, T cells, complement activation, and microbiome dysbiosis contributing to pathogenesis. We applied a previously established method of microarray molecular analysis to a set of 71 UC biopsies (from 61 patients), to elucidate the molecular changes associated with active UC, specifically comparing UC to T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), as a prototype of a sterile, T-cell mediated disease. 71 for-cause UC colonic biopsies were collected at the U of A Hospital in Edmonton, AB and Cedars-Sinai Hospital in LA, California. These biopsies were processed using Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays and the data analyzed in R programming language. Gene expression data was displayed using volcano plots (showing the fold change and association between the genes and endoscopic Mayo score) and heatmaps (showing expression of the top 30 genes in a cell panel). We then analyzed overexpression of the top genes using the DAVID tool1, and compared the results to similar results for top genes overexpressed in TCMR. The volcano plot (Figure 1) showed strong associations between the endoscopic Mayo score and decay accelerating factor (CD55), and moderate associations with calprotectin genes (S100A8/S100A9), with lesser associations for effector T cell transcripts (i.e. CTLA4, interferon gamma (IFNG), and chemokine ligand (CXCL13)), many IFNG inducible transcripts, inflammasome transcripts (CASP1), and toll-like receptors (TLR5). NLRP3 (incriminated in mouse UC models) did not pass the IQR filter and was not significant. Expression of the top genes in a cell panel showed primary expression in monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, with some expression in epithelial and endothelial cells, while minimal expression was found in CD4/CD8 T cells, or in NK cells. Pathway analysis showed major differences between pathway terms. Our findings show that while transcripts associated with cognate T cell inflammatory processes (TCMR) are expressed in UC, there are substantial differences between the pathogenesis of a pure T cell-mediated disease and UC. In our cohort, the top genes associated with the endoscopic Mayo score in UC were not those associated with effector T cells: T cell-associated transcripts were only moderately associated with the Mayo score, and pathway analysis showed significant differences between TCMR and UC, which is much more an inflammatory environment with strong associations to CD55. This suggests that cognate T cell recognition is present in UC but supplemented by a second source of inflammation. 1. Huang et al. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protocols (2009). Figure 1. Molecular landscape of UC by volcano plot. Samples towards upper right have high association and fold change, indicating a significant association with endoscopic Mayo score, while samples towards the middle left are not strongly associated. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→