MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789767999 · doi:10.3389/fncel.2018.00036

It's All about Timing: The Involvement of Kir4.1 Channel Regulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Pathology

2018· review· en· W2789767999 on OpenAlexaff
Meagan Milton, Patrice D. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon channel regulation and function
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutophagyPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayIschemiaProgrammed cell deathPotassium channelStroke (engine)MedicineGlutamate receptorNeuroscienceHomeostasisNecroptosisCell biologyBrain ischemiaCancer researchBiologyPathologySignal transductionInternal medicineApoptosisReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a cerebrovascular disease that is predominately caused by a blood clot that limits blood flow and results in neuronal loss. Glial cells, specifically astrocytes, have been shown to support neurons in the area impacted by the stroke. Kir4.1, an inwardly rectifying potassium channel found predominantly on astrocytes, is involved in K+ spatial buffering, glutamate uptake, and water and volume regulation. Due to these properties, Kir4.1 may also be involved in preventing neuronal loss following ischemia. Potassium-starvation results in programmed cell death under ischemic conditions due to autophagic up-regulation. However, recent evidence indicates that the time at which the autophagic pathway is activated determines whether or not it results in cell survival or death following ischemia. Furthermore, the application of rapamycin, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, reduces the amount of cell survival during times that previously resulted in cell survival due to autophagy under normal conditions. This suggests that Kir4.1 may be linked to the activation of the mTOR pathway, due to its ability to maintain potassium homeostasis, resulting in cell survival under ischemic conditions. The current review proposes a potential underlying mechanism, involving Kir4.1, in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Cellular NeuroscienceSame topicIon channel regulation and functionFrench-language works237,207