MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789800801 · doi:10.1002/mmce.21250

A miniaturized printed monopole antenna for 5.2-5.8 GHz WLAN applications

2018· article· en· W2789800801 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Farouk Chetouah, Salih Aidel, Nacerdine Bouzit, Idris Messaoudene

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Recherche et de SécuritéInstitut national de la recherche scientifique
KeywordsGround planeMiniaturizationMonopole antennaWi-FiBandwidth (computing)MicrostripMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaElectrical impedanceAcousticsElectrical engineeringImpedance matchingAntenna (radio)Electronic engineeringWirelessTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineeringWireless network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a new design of a compact printed rectangular antenna for wireless local area network (WLAN) applications in 802.11a is investigated. The defected ground structure (DGS) technique is successfully used to reduce the ground plane by cutting a large slot to achieve significant miniaturization. The ground plane structure consists of inverted ‘L’ shape. The rectangular radiating element has a size of 6 × 5 mm2 and is connected to a microstrip transmission feed line. The simulated and measured resonance frequency of the single-band antenna is approximately 5.8 GHz and may cover an impedance bandwidth of 1 GHz for the measurement and 1.65 GHz for the simulation. The simulated and the measured data are in good agreement. The proposed antenna is very compact (10 × 6 mm2) and its impedance bandwidth is suitable for the 5.2-5.8 GHz WLAN communication systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided EngineeringSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207