MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2789801345 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx180.761

P634 Clinical and endoscopic remission with vedolizumab treatment in ulcerative colitis

2018· article· en· W2789801345 on OpenAlexaffabout
Abdulelah Almutairdi, Christopher Ma, Paulo Gustavo Kotze, A Al-Damarki, Shane Devlin, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Cynthia H. Seow, Kerri L. Novak, Cathy Lu, Jose G. Ferraz, Michael J. Stewart, Michelle Buresi, M. Mathivanan, Humberto Jijon, Joan Heatherington, M Martin, Remo Panaccione

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVedolizumabMedicineUlcerative colitisInternal medicineGastroenterologyRegimenMaintenance therapySurgeryRetrospective cohort studyChemotherapyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-specific α4β7 integrin antagonist that has demonstrated efficacy in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) randomised controlled trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the symptomatic and endoscopic response and remission rates achieved with VDZ therapy in UC in the real-world setting. A retrospective cohort study was performed at the University of Calgary with adult (≥18 years) UC patients receiving VDZ induction between 2012 and 2017. All patients received standard induction therapy with VDZ 300 mg IV at Weeks 0, 2, and 6 and were advanced onto a scheduled maintenance IV regimen. The primary outcome was clinical or endoscopic response and remission at 3, 6, and 12 months after induction. Clinical remission was defined by a partial Mayo score <2. Clinical response was defined by a reduction in partial Mayo score of ≥2. Endoscopic remission was defined by achievement of endoscopic Mayo subscore of 0. Endoscopic response was defined by a reduction in endoscopic Mayo subscore ≥1. We identified 100 UC patients treated with VDZ. Mean follow-up was 51.3 weeks (SD ± 35.8 weeks). Almost half (47 of 100) of patients had previously failed anti-TNF therapy. Steroid-free clinical remission at 3, 6, and 12 months after induction was 51.0% (51 of 100), 61.8% (55 of 89), and 61.9% (39 of 63), respectively. Steroid-free endoscopic remission occurred in 27.5% (11 of 40), 41.0% (16 of 39), and 47.8% (22 of 46) of patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively (Figure 1). Twenty-five patients required dose escalation to 300 mg IV q4 weeks (20 patients) or q6 weeks (5 patients). VDZ was discontinued in 24 patients (15 for primary non-response, 6 for secondary loss of response, and 3 for other indications). An adverse event (AE) was reported in 24 patients (24.0%). The most common AEs were joint symptoms (6.0%), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis (4.0%), and upper respiratory tract infections (4.0%). One patient developed a rectal adenocarcinoma after 6 months of VDZ initiation and required colectomy. Two deaths occurred in the cohort: one patient developed a stage IV high-grade neuroendocrine rectal tumour and a second patient died from recurrence of oropharyngeal carcinoma which had been initially diagnosed prior to VDZ initiation. Symptomatic and endoscopic response and remission rates with vedolizumab. In this cohort of UC patients, VDZ was safe and effective for inducing steroid-free clinical and endoscopic remission. Over half of patients achieved clinical remission and nearly half achieved endoscopic mucosal healing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→