The role of AMP‐activated protein kinase in the expression of the dystrophin‐associated protein complex in skeletal muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stimulation of AMPK induces the expression of dystrophin-associated protein complex (DAPC) components in skeletal muscle, whereas reductions in AMPK are associated with DAPC dysfunction. We sought to determine whether AMPK was necessary for the maintenance of DAPC expression in skeletal muscle. Fast, glycolytic extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and slow, oxidative soleus (Sol) muscles from wild-type mice and from littermates with skeletal muscle-specific knockout of the AMPK β1 and β2 subunits (AMPK β1 β2M-KO; MKO) were analyzed. DAPC mRNA and protein expression were similar between genotypes, with the exception of elevated neuronal nitric oxide synthase expression at the sarcolemma in MKO muscles. The content of transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulators of the DAPC was also not affected by the loss of AMPK. However, MyoD and myogenin expression was diminished in MKO muscles, consistent with previous reports of myopathy in these animals. Furthermore, we observed decrements in extrasynaptic utrophin expression selectively in MKO Sol muscles, likely due to the adaptive accumulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α at the sarcolemma of MKO EDL muscles. Collectively, the evidence indicates that AMPK is sufficient but not essential for the maintenance of DAPC expression in skeletal muscle, yet it is required for preserving extrasynaptic utrophin levels in slow oxidative muscles.-Dial, A. G., Rooprai, P., Lally, J. S., Bujak, A. L., Steinberg, G. R., Ljubicic, V. The role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the expression of the dystrophin-associated protein complex in skeletal muscle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".