Acellular Human Dermal Allograft as a Graft for Nasal Septal Perforation Reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nasal septal perforations pose a troubling source of morbidity for patients and a difficult problem for the otolaryngologist. Multiple surgical techniques have been tried, with inconsistent success. Prosthetic nasal buttons also have limitations, including patient intolerance and dissatisfaction. Acellular human dermal allograft (AlloDerm) has been described as an alternative material for septal perforation repair. The authors studied objective and subjective outcomes, including quantification of the patient's symptoms in septal perforation repair with AlloDerm. METHODS: The authors performed a prospective cohort study of 12 patients with 1- to 2-cm anterior septal perforations who were recruited from a tertiary care practice. Patients with admitted smoking or cocaine use in the previous 3 months or vascular or granulomatous diseases were excluded. Subjective scores on the Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22, along with objective nasal endoscopy and acoustic rhinometry measures, were collected at baseline and 2, 4, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Patients were followed for reperforation 9 to 20 months postoperatively. Data were normalized to baseline values and analyzed using analysis of variance and Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Successful closure of the septal perforation was obtained in 10 of 12 patients and confirmed with rigid nasal endoscopy. Nasal symptom scores (Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 ) were significantly reduced to 52.8 percent (95 percent CI, 35.1 to 70.5 percent; p < 0.01) of baseline symptoms at 4 weeks postoperatively. At 12 weeks postoperatively, symptoms were measured at 26.6 percent (95 percent CI, 10.9 to 42.1 percent; p < 0.01) of baseline symptoms. Acoustic rhinometry confirmed perforation closure, demonstrating a reduction in cross-sectional nasal area from baseline of 55.1 percent (95 percent CI, 37.7 to 66.8 percent; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to use objective and subjective measurements to confirm success with acellular dermis allograft as an adjunct for septal perforation repair, demonstrating a statistically significant reduction in patient nasal symptoms following repair. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".