Review: Confronting the Chaos <i>A Rogue Historian Returns to Afghanistan</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONFRONTING THE CHAOS A Rogue Historian Returns to Afghanistan Sean M. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2009. 256 pp, US$34.95 cloth. ISBN 978-1-59114-508-0The first time I met Sean we were both hunkered down behind a plywood and sandbag abutment at the US aviation shack on Kandahar airfield trying to reap what shade we could find from the pitiless Afghan sun. We were waiting for a CH-47 Chinook transport helicopter to take us north where, as it turned out, we were both attending a shura at the newly opened Canadian forward operating base the Sha WaIi Kot district. I learned first hand listening to Maloney s musings that he was a historian of a different stripe and this was far from the first of his helicopter sojourns over this antique land. His new book, Confronting the Chaos, is vintage that it is infused with unvarnished opinion and insight based on handson research and time in country. This book is the second of what will be a trilogy bundling Maloney1 s many visits to the Afghan theatre. It focuses on the events of 2003 through 2005, ending with the international security assistance force's expansion into Afghanistan's troubled southern region. The final instalment will open with the commencement of Canadian combat operations this region March 2006. And what a rich repository of recollection and nuance the completed trilogy will comprise.This latest effort contains much that military historians and veterans will want to harvest: clipped conversations with players what describes as the chess game of contemporary Afghanistan; insight into the thoughts and opinions of the key players inside the NATO force; and impressions felt and experienced and impossible to glean from secondary sources and remote study. Consider this reflection on the Tobyhanna army depot forward repair faculty at Bagram, a veritable bone yard of replacement war machines of the contemporary battlefield:It was totally surreal. Warfare the information age was impossible without photocopiers, printers, hard drives, and modems.... The environment gave a beating to the delicate equipment originally designed and built for an insurance company Ohio or a lawyer's office Maine. These machines were war-weary, their silicon hearts pushed to the limits by the war Afghanistan (64).In his examination of the period from 2003 to 2005, has ventured where few scholars and writers have dared. In informed detail, he explores the early history of both operation Enduring Freedom and the NATO missions Afghanistan. His sense of chronology and attention to nuance the creation of combined forces command-Afghanistan, for example, and the description of Major General Andy Leslie and Ambassador Chris Alexander's steerage Kabul are intriguing. His writing has an edge and literary swagger.Before becoming an academic, attended the Royal Military College of Canada and logged time as an army subaltern. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".