MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789963188 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.242

A242 SIGMOID PERFORATION: A RARE CASE OF REFRACTORY CELIAC DISEASE TYPE II

2018· article· en· W2789963188 on OpenAlexaff
Richa Chibbar, Jordan J. Nostedt, Dana Mihalicz, Ross McLean, Jean Deschênes, Levinus A. Dieleman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsRoyal Alexandra HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterologyIntraepithelial lymphocyteVillous atrophyInternal medicineEnteropathyGluten freeColonoscopyPerforationPopulationPathologyCoeliac diseaseDiseaseCancerColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Celiac disease is an autoimmune enteropathy caused by gluten ingestion in genetically susceptible individuals. Treatment consists of a gluten-free diet (GFD). Non-responders typically have an incidental source of gluten ingestion; however, 1% develops refractory celiac disease (RCD). RCD is defined as persistent or recurrent malabsorption, villous atrophy despite a strict GFD for 6–12 months. It is further classified as type I (RCD I) and type II (RCD II) by immunophenotyping. RCD I has a normal population of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), while RCD II has aberrant IELs, which have T-cell clonality. RCD II is associated with EATL and is considered a pre-malignant condition, and more difficult to treat. - A 68-year old gentleman with a background including hypothyroidism, small bowel obstruction with lysis of adhesions, and family history of CD presented with acute-onset abdominal pain. CT abdomen showed free air and stranding in the proximal jejunum. Exploratory laparotomy found a spontaneous jejunal perforation and proximal stricturing. 20 cm of small bowel was resected. Histology review showed monoclonal T-cell receptor arrangement. He presented 2 months later with weight loss, diarrhea, and hypoalbuminemia. Gastroscopy showed scalloping of the duodenal mucosa and flattened villi; colonoscopy was normal. Biopsies showed villous atrophy with intraepithelial lymphocytosis, lymphocytic gastritis, and lymphocytic colitis. He was given supplemental nutrition and intravenous corticosteroids, but did not improve. Small bowel enteroscopy demonstrated a purulent-appearing anastomosis with fistulous opening; biopsies showed severe villous atrophy, and the anastomosis demonstrated mucosal ulceration with inflammatory exudate. Following repeat colonoscopy, he had a perforation and underwent exploratory laparotomy, lysis of adhesions, and small bowel and sigmoid resection. Biopsies confirmed ulcerative jejunoileitis consistent with RCD II. He continued to be non-responsive to corticosteroid therapy. Though there was no histologic evidence of malignancy, he continued to do poorly, and died. This patient’s serum sample was collected for antigen analysis, versus patients with classic celiac disease. - RCD II is a rare entity, emphasizing the importance of immunophenotyping in diagnosis; this has significant prognostic implications. Treatment data relies primarily on case reports; there is a paucity of randomized control trials. Therapy typically results in clinical and histological improvement, but does not prevent progression to EATL. This case highlights the difficulty of diagnosis of RCD II. It is one of the first cases to present with sigmoid perforation and to demonstrate both lymphocytic gastritis and lymphocytic colitis in RCD II. In addition, it is a pilot study of the serum analysis in RCD II patients. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0080.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207