MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790014560

Macro- and micro-structure comparison of ancient and modern iron-rich stromatolites

2015· dissertation· en· W2790014560 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adrian Arts

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacroGeologyPaleontologyGeographyArchaeologyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gunflint and Biwabik Formations comprise the middle units of the Paleoproterozoic Animikie Group that crop out near the northwestern shore of Lake Superior. Stromatolitic units were investigated and sampled at 9 outcrop sites, 4 mine sites and in 12 drill-cores. Controversy exists as to whether the stromatolitic units that are now composed of chert were deposited as a silica gel or represent carbonate replaced by chert. There is also debate in the literature as to whether the iron oxides that coat many microfossils are primary or deposited during later diagenesis. Younger examples of siliceous stromatolites are very rare and iron hydroxides coating bacteria are only known from limited modern environments. Thus, understanding the primary composition of the Gunflint microbialites will provide information on ocean chemistry during this interval.
\nThree stromatolitic members have previously been described within these formations: the Lower Stromatolitic Member containing stromatolites that grow directly on the peneplained Archean basement or on the conglomerate which forms the base of the Animikie Group, a Middle Member 45 to 50 meters above the base, and the Stromatolitic Limestone Member at the top of the formation directly beneath the Sudbury impact layer. Based on this work, a new Upper Stromatolitic Member 50 meters below the Limestone Member in the Gunflint Formation was recognized. This member contains abundant iron-silica-carbonate-manganese oncolites, and is correlative to stromatolitic units described from the Biwabik. The oncolites represent a primary-to-very-early authigenic, precipitated mineral assemblage. The accretion of lacustrine ferromanganese nodules at the sediment-water redox boundary provides a modern analogue for the development of the oncolites described in this work.
\nThe presence of exceptionally well-preserved, hematite coated microfossils, encased in chert in the relatively unmetamorphosed Middle Stromatolitic Member together with positive cerium and europium anomalies indicates that these sediments were deposited at a redox boundary in ocean waters near saturation with respect to silica and iron. Conversely, precipitates containing carbonaceous filaments in the Lower Stromatolitic Member contain a distinct negative cerium anomaly, indicating deposition in an oxidized environment.
\nAlternating manganese- and iron-rich laminae within the Upper Stromatolitic Member indicate a fluctuating redoxcline and oxygen levels in the shallow subtidal to peritidal environments within the Animikie Basin. The fluctuation reduces the Fe:Mn ratio, allowing for the less readily oxidized manganese to precipitate. The presence of dehydration cracks which cross-cut original ooid and stromatolitic laminae indicate that deposition of the silica and iron most probably occurred as amorphous gels of opal-A and iron hydroxides.
\nThis study strongly indicates the Gunflint and Biwabik stromatolites were originally siliceous and formed by a different precipitation mechanism than that of Proterozoic carbonate stromatolites or modern agglutinated forms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University)Same topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207