MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790060700 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx180.032

OP033 The effect of tofacitinib on serum lipids and cardiovascular safety in patients with ulcerative colitis: results from the tofacitinib ulcerative colitis clinical programme

2018· article· en· W2790060700 on OpenAlexaff
B E Sands, Pam R. Taub, Brian G. Feagan, Alessandro Armuzzi, Gary S. Friedman, Michele Moscariello, Nervin Lawendy, Ronald Pedersen, Gary Chan, Chudy I. Nduaka, Daniel Quirk, Leonardo Salese, Chinyu Su

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTofacitinibMedicineUlcerative colitisInternal medicineGastroenterologyPlaceboJanus kinase inhibitorAdverse effectDyslipidemiaObesityDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor that is being investigated for ulcerative colitis (UC). We describe baseline (BL) cardiovascular (CV) risk, the effect of tofacitinib treatment on lipid concentrations, and incidence rates (IRs; patients with events per 100 patient-years) of major adverse CV events (MACE) in patients enrolled in the UC global development programme. Analyses were performed for patients in three placebo-controlled induction studies (Ind), a 52-week placebo-controlled maintenance study (Main) and an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (LTE) study (N = 1157). Lipid concentrations were assessed at pre-induction BL and up to Week 61 for responders to tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID) in Ind who were randomised to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID or placebo in Main. IRs and confidence intervals (CI) for MACE were calculated (follow-up to December 2016), including patients with ≥1 event per 100 patient-years of exposure. The distribution of CV risk factors and Reynolds Risk Score (RRS) was determined for male patients ≤45 and >45 years and female patients ≤55 and >55 years. Mean pt age was 41.3 years. At BL, RRS was ≥10% in 24.4% of males >45 years and 6.4% of females >55 years. Most patients did not require lipid-lowering medication (Table). Dose-dependent increases in total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and triglycerides were observed, which remained stable up to Week 61 in Main patients assigned to placebo, tofacitinib 5 mg BID and 10 mg BID; LDL-c:HDL-c and TC:HDL-c ratios were unchanged. In the overall clinical programme, four MACE events were reported (IR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07, 0.62; males 3/668 [0.4%]; females 1/475 [0.2%]): one haemorrhagic stroke, one aortic dissection, one acute coronary syndrome, one myocardial infarction. The aortic dissection resulted in death (patient had 1 CV risk factor). The haemorrhagic stroke led to permanent tofacitinib discontinuation. The myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome events led to temporary tofacitinib discontinuation (patients completed the study). These three patients had ≥4 CV risk factors at BL, including hyperlipidaemia. Tofacitinib treatment was associated with increases in TC, HDL-c and LDL-c in patients with UC, while LDL-c:HDL-c and TC:HDL-c ratios were unaffected. These results are similar to those reported for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MACE events were infrequent, with rates similar to those reported in the tofacitinib RA programme and for other UC agents; three of four patients had multiple CV risk factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207