MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790089261 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2017-0230

Mesenchymal stem cells pretreated with melatonin ameliorate kidney functions in a rat model of diabetic nephropathy

2018· article· en· W2790089261 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laila Ahmed Rashed, Samah Elattar, Nashwa Eltablawy, Hend Ashour, Lamiaa Mohamed Mahmoud, Yasmin El-Esawy

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCairo University
KeywordsMesenchymal stem cellDiabetic nephropathyMelatoninPathogenesisIn vitroKidneySuperoxide dismutaseChemistryEndocrinologyAutophagyInternal medicineMedicineBiologyOxidative stressCell biologyApoptosisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a regenerative therapy comprising mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) pretreated with melatonin (MT) as a new therapy for underlying diabetic nephropathy (DN) pathogenesis in a rat model, and its possible effect on autophagy protein Beclin-1. Forty adult male albino Wistar rats were distributed among 4 groups: (i) control, (ii) DN, (iii) MSC-treated, and (iv) treated with MSCs that were pre-incubated in-vitro with MT (5 μmol·L –1 for 24 h; MSCs + MT). MSCs treatment significantly improved the renal functions and ameliorated the measured underlying DN pathogenesis and elevation of Beclin-1 protein levels compared with the DN group. In-vitro pretreatment of MSCs with MT enhanced proliferation and efficiency, and thus improved the kidney functions by increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD-1) and Beclin-1, and decreasing transforming growth factor (TGF-β) markers in the kidney tissue, compared with the MSC group (P < 0.05). In conclusion: MSCs represent a promising target in DN management, and their effect can be intensified by pretreatment with MT. The elevated levels of Beclin-1 could be a mediator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207