MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

KEYNOTE-224: Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib.

2018· article· en· W2790105191 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew X. Zhu, Richard S. Finn, Stéphane Cattan, Julien Edeline, Sadahisa Ogasawara, Daniel H. Palmer, Chris Verslype, Vittorina Zagonel, Olivier Rosmorduc, Arndt Vogel, Debashis Sarker, Gontran Verset, Stephen L. Chan, Jennifer J. Knox, Bruno Daniele, Scot Ebbinghaus, Junshui Ma, Abby B. Siegel, Ann‐Lii Cheng, Masatoshi Kudo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabSorafenibInternal medicineTolerabilityDiscontinuationHepatocellular carcinomaOncologyClinical endpointResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsAdverse effectGastroenterologyProgressive diseaseSurgeryClinical trialImmunotherapyPhases of clinical researchDiseaseCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

209 Background: Immunotherapy approaches, including immune checkpoint blockade, have shown initial promising results in HCC. Anti PD-1 therapy with pembrolizumab has demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in multiple cancers. KEYNOTE-224 (NCT02702414), an open label, phase 2 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in pts with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib. Methods: Eligible pts were age ≥18 y with confirmed HCC, radiographic progression after sorafenib and disease not amenable to curative treatment, Child Pugh A, ECOG PS 0-1 and predicted life expectancy > 3 mo. Pts received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for 2 y or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or investigator decision. Response was assessed every 9 wk (RECIST v1.1, central review). Primary endpoint was ORR (RECIST v1.1, central review). Secondary endpoints included DOR, DCR, PFS, OS, and safety and tolerability. Data cutoff date was Aug 24, 2017. Results: Of 104 treated pts, 23 continued therapy (median follow up 8.4 mo, range 0.4-13.6). Median age of pts was 68y (range 43-87), 21.2% were HBV+, 26% were HCV+, 94.2% were Child Pugh A, 79.8% had PD on sorafenib and 63.5% had extrahepatic disease. ORR was 16.3% (95% CI, 9.8 to 24.9) and similar across subgroups with different etiology. Median time to response was 2.1 mo (range 1.8-4.8) and 94% of responders were estimated to have a response duration ≥6 mo. Best responses were CR in 1 patient (1.0%), PR in 16 (15.4%), SD in 47 (45.2%) and PD in 34 (32.7%); DCR was 61.5%. Median PFS was 4.8 mo (95% CI, 3.4 to 6.6) and median OS (9.4 to NA) was not reached. The 6 mo PFS and OS rates were 43.1% and 77.9%, respectively. Treatment related (TR) AE occurred in 73.1% of pts; fatigue (21.2%) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (12.5%) were seen in ≥10% of pts and grades 3-5 TRAE in 25% including 1 death (ulcerative esophagitis). No cases of HBV/HCV flare occurred; immune mediated hepatitis occurred in 3 (2.9%) pts. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab treatment resulted in durable responses and favorable PFS and OS in pts with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib. Safety was generally comparable to that established for pembrolizumab monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02702414.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207