The safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of BI 409306, a novel and potent PDE9 inhibitor: Overview of three Phase I randomised trials in healthy volunteers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of BI 409306, a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 9A inhibitor, were assessed in healthy subjects in three Phase I, within-dose group, double-blind trials. Trial 1 randomised young and elderly subjects to receive BI 409306 25, 50, 100 mg, placebo once daily (OD) or BI 409306 50 mg twice daily (young) for 14 days. Trial 2 randomised young poor metabolisers (PM) of cytochrome P450 isoform 2C19 (CYP2C19) and elderly subjects to receive BI 409306 25, 50 mg or placebo OD for 14 days. Trial 3 randomised Chinese and Japanese extensive metabolisers of CYP2C19 to receive single doses (SD) of BI 409306 25, 50, 100 mg or placebo and Chinese (PM) to SD of BI 409306 100 mg or placebo (Part 1). Japanese PM received SD of BI 409306 100 mg or placebo (Day 1) followed by BI 409306 100 mg or placebo OD for 7 days after a 48-hour washout period (Part 2). Reported adverse events (AE) were mild-to-moderate intensity and increased with BI 409306 dose. Eye disorders were most commonly reported (Trial 1: 40.0-41.7%, Trial 2: 29.2-37.5%, Trial 3: 18.2-66.7%) and increased with dose and systemic exposure. PM reported more AEs than other treatment groups, corresponding to higher systemic exposure to BI 409306. Systemic exposure to BI 409306 produced dose-dependent increases and was slightly greater in elderly versus young subgroups (Trial 1). Steady state was achieved by Day 2-3. Overall, BI 409306 demonstrated good safety, tolerability and minor accumulation after multiple dosing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".