MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790184483 · doi:10.4103/ijccm.ijccm_460_17

Smoke Inhalation Injury: Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management

2018· review· en· W2790184483 on OpenAlexaff
Kapil Gupta, Mayank Mehrotra, Parul Kumar, Anoop Raj Gogia, Arun Prasad, Joseph A. Fisher

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Critical Care Medicine · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBurn Injury Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaSmoke inhalationPulmonary edemaAirwayInhalationBronchoalveolar lavageBronchoconstrictionIntensive care medicineLungInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In major fire disasters such as 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Centre in New York, smoke inhalation injury was an important cause of mortality. Smoke inhalation injury increases the mortality by 24 times in fire-related injuries e objective of this article is to review the etiopathogenesis, early diagnosis, and latest management guidelines of smoke inhalation injury. This knowledge is important for anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care specialists, who are frequently involved in the care of these patients. pathophysIology Smoke inhalation injury is caused by the inspiration of steam, superheated gases, or toxic, often incomplete products of combustion. The heating capacity of steam is 4000 times that of hot dry air and thus causes tissue damage, even with momentary contact. The various toxic compounds present in smoke are carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen cyanide (HCN), phosgene, ammonia, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), formaldehyde, and acrylonitriles. Some of these superheated products of combustion are inhaled, causing thermal burns to the airway mucosa. Particles larger than 10 in size are retained in the nasopharynx, but 1-2 sized particles can pass into the alveoli. oke inhalation results in three physiological types of injury: (a) thermal injury predominantly to the upper Smoke inhalation injury is a major determinant of morbidity and mortality in fire victims. It is a complex multifaceted injury affecting initially the airway; however, in short time, it can become a complex life-threatening systemic disease affecting every organ in the body. In this review, we provide a summary of the underlying pathophysiology of organ dysfunction and provide an up-to-date survey of the various critical care modalities that have been found beneficial in caring for these patients. Major pathophysiological change is development of edema in the respiratory tract. The tracheobronchial tree is injured by steam and toxic chemicals, leading to bronchoconstriction. Lung parenchyma is damaged by the release of proteolytic elastases, leading to release of inflammatory mediators, increase in transvascular flux of fluids, and development of pulmonary edema and atelectasis. Decreased levels of surfactant and immunomodulators such as interleukins and tumor-necrosis-factor- accentuate the injury. A primary survey is conducted at the site of fire, to ensure adequate airway, breathing, and circulation. A good intravenous access is obtained for the administration of resuscitation fluids. Early intubation, preferably with fiberoptic bronchoscope, is prudent before development of airway edema. Bronchial hygiene is maintained, which involves therapeutic coughing, chest physiotherapy, deep breathing exercises, and early ambulation. Pharmacological agents such as beta-2 agonists, racemic epinephrine, N-acetyl cysteine, and aerosolized heparin are used for improving oxygenation of lungs. Newer agents being tested are perfluorohexane, porcine pulmonary surfactant, and ClearMate. Early diagnosis and treatment of smoke inhalation injury are the keys for better outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of Critical Care MedicineSame topicBurn Injury Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207