China’s New Diplomatic Relations with Panama: Prospect of Future Economic Cooperation and Partnership in Latin America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On June 13, 2017, the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Panama established diplomatic relations with the foreign ministers of both countries signing a joint communiqu in Beijing. In addition to legal implications, the establishment of diplomatic relations would also bring prospect of economic cooperation and partnership between them. As Article 3 of VCDR provides: "The functions of a diplomatic mission consist inter alia in promoting friendly relations between the sending State and the receiving State, and developing their economic, cultural and scientific relations," the prospect of economic cooperation and partnership is certainly an important dimension of what the China-Panama diplomatic relations can bring to both countries. Wang Yi, the Chinese foreign minister, said that China is Panama's "stable and ever-lasting cooperation partner in economy" and emphasized that "China is willing to [] comprehensively enhance exchanges and cooperation in various fields, in a bid to benefit the two countries and the two peoples." 3 Isabel de Saint Malo, the vicepresident and foreign minister of Panama hoped that "the new relationship would lead to trade, investment and tourism opportunities, in particular exporting more goods from Panama to China."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".