Differences in standard metabolic rate at the range edge versus the center of an expanding invasive population of <i>Xenopus laevis</i> in the West of France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Empirical and theoretical studies have investigated the trade‐offs between reproduction, dispersal and/or survival that may arise between individuals at the range edge of an expanding population. The differential allocation of resources to these life‐history traits may then be constrained by the metabolism of an individual. Previous studies of an invasive expanding population of the frog Xenopus laevis in the West of France showed an increase in allocation of resources to dispersal and a decrease in allocation to reproduction in individuals from the range front. The present study focuses on physiological variation through an analysis of the standard metabolic rate ( SMR ). SMR was analyzed through measurements of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production under resting conditions. Our results show a positive correlation between SMR and individual size and weight, but no difference in body condition is observed between individuals from the center and those from the periphery of the range. Moreover, a decrease in SMR at the periphery was observed in both sexes. Yet, a significant interaction effect between sex and site was observed. Males had a higher SMR than females at the center while females from the periphery showed a higher SMR than males. A lower SMR may allow animals from the periphery to allocate more resources to other functions, such as locomotion, and therefore dispersal. In contrast, the relatively higher SMR in females from the periphery (compared to males) is likely to be driven by the important energetic cost of reproduction in addition to the environmental and demographic constraints at the edge of an expanding population. From the perspective of conservation biology, these results attest to the importance of understanding the biological and evolutionary mechanisms underpinning the selection of traits to estimate the invasive potential of exotic species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".