A Reduced‐Order Successive Linear Estimator for Geostatistical Inversion and its Application in Hydraulic Tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hydraulic tomography (HT) is a recently developed technology for characterizing high‐resolution, site‐specific heterogeneity using hydraulic data ( n d ) from a series of cross‐hole pumping tests. To properly account for the subsurface heterogeneity and to flexibly incorporate additional information, geostatistical inverse models, which permit a large number of spatially correlated unknowns ( n y ), are frequently used to interpret the collected data. However, the memory storage requirements for the covariance of the unknowns ( n y × n y ) in these models are prodigious for large‐scale 3‐D problems. Moreover, the sensitivity evaluation is often computationally intensive using traditional difference method ( n y forward runs). Although employment of the adjoint method can reduce the cost to n d forward runs, the adjoint model requires intrusive coding effort. In order to resolve these issues, this paper presents a Reduced‐Order Successive Linear Estimator (ROSLE) for analyzing HT data. This new estimator approximates the covariance of the unknowns using Karhunen‐Loeve Expansion (KLE) truncated to n kl order, and it calculates the directional sensitivities (in the directions of n kl eigenvectors) to form the covariance and cross‐covariance used in the Successive Linear Estimator (SLE). In addition, the covariance of unknowns is updated every iteration by updating the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. The computational advantages of the proposed algorithm are demonstrated through numerical experiments and a 3‐D transient HT analysis of data from a highly heterogeneous field site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".