MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2790522381 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.332

A332 FIRST REPORTED EUS-GUIDED DOUBLE BYPASS PERFORMED IN COLLABORATION WITH INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY

2018· article· en· W2790522381 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Hashim, Ali Bessissow, David Valenti, Kevin Waschke, Josée Parent, Alan Barkun, Sheryl White, Y Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalMcGill UniversityMontreal General HospitalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBalloonRadiologyStentPercutaneousFluoroscopyInterventional radiologyBalloon dilationSurgeryEndoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided double bypass (EUS-DB) is a novel technique in the management of concomitant biliary and gastric outlet obstruction. It involves the creation of both an EUS-guided gastroenterostomy and hepatogastrostomy To describe the first reported case in the literature (with video) of EUS-DB performed in collaboration with interventional radiology (IR) A 54-year old male known for locally advanced pancreatic cancer was referred for recurrent cholangitis and gastric outlet obstruction despite previous duodenal stenting and transhepatic percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD). Endoscopy confirmed complete obstruction of the duodenal stent due to tumor tissue ingrowth. A decision was made to proceed to EUS-DB to optimize nutritional status, biliary drainage, and patient comfort IR introduced a guidewire through the PTBD traversing the enteral stent and advanced to the jejunum. A 20 mm dilating balloon with an overlapping snare attached was then introduced over the PTBD wire and advanced across the enteral stent to the ligament of Treitz where the balloon was inflated under fluoroscopy. Overall, 500 ml of both saline and contrast was then injected percutaneously to dilate the small bowel segment proximal to the balloon. EUS-guided puncture of the balloon was performed transgastrically with a 19-gauge needle. Bursting of the balloon confirmed successful puncture in the desired jejunal segment. An 0.035-inch guidewire was then advanced through the needle and grasped with the snare and pulled through the percutaneous access thereby creating wire tension on both ends of the wire. Track dilation was performed with a 4 mm dilating balloon. A Lumen-apposing metal stent (15 x 10 mm) was then deployed under EUS guidance. Contrast injection confirmed a patent gastroenterostomy. Attention was then shifted to the HGS. Under EUS a dilated hepatic segment III left intrahepatic bile duct was visualized. A transgastric puncture of the duct was performed with a 19-gauge needle, followed by the advancement of an 0.035-inch guidewire into the common bile duct. The HGS track was then dilated using a 4mm dilating balloon followed by successful deployment of a 10 x 80 mm partially covered self-expanding metal stent. A full stent diet was initiated 48 hours post procedure with excellent tolerance. PTBD was removed 3 days later with the bilirubin having decreased by more than 50 % at the 1-week follow-up We describe the first reported EUS-guided double bypass performed in collaboration with IR. Combining endoscopic and interventional radiology techniques may enhance the safety and ease of this novel approach. Further studies; however, will be needed to validate this technique None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→