MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790544888 · doi:10.26525/jtfs2018.30.1.95105

ESTIMATION OF POLLEN CONTAMINATION AND MATING SYSTEM IN PINUS MERKUSII SEEDLING SEED ORCHARD USING ALLOZYME MARKERS

2018· article· en· W2790544888 on OpenAlexafffund
Endah Suwarni, Stephen F. Omondi, Dancik Bp, Damase P. Khasa

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCE · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in RehabilitationUniversity of AlbertaUniversité Laval
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsSeed orchardSeedlingPollenBiologyPinus <genus>BotanyAgronomyOrchardMating designContaminationHorticultureEcologyHybrid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The amount of pollen contamination and mating system parameters in a Pinus merkusii seedling seed orchard in East Java were estimated using allozyme gene markers. By running starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from the haploid megagametophyte side by side with the diploid embryo, the precise information on male and female gametic contribution to the seed produced in the seed orchard was identified. The estimation was based on the single-locus allelic frequency differences between seed orchard populations and an unimproved plantation of the species surrounding the orchard. The study revealed high level of pollen contamination (29.7 18%) in the seed orchard. Excess homozygotes obtained from the orchard suggests that consanguineous matings have occurred. Multilocus outcrossing rates of the three blocks and four local stands ranged from 0.137 to 0.305, and single-locus outcrossing rates ranged from 0.102 to 0.244. The seed orchard design, wind direction during flowering period and flowering synchronisation could have contributed to the pollen contamination and inbreeding observed. Although pollen contamination and inbreeding may be a problem in this seed orchard, the seed may still be useful. Management considerations for such seed orchard to deal with these problems are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCESame topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207