MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790550468 · doi:10.1111/vop.12557

Bilateral retinoschisis in a dog: A veterinary clinical application for optical coherence tomography

2018· article· en· W2790550468 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elizabeth A. F. Schaefer, Rebecca E.H. Whiting, Jacqueline W. Pearce, Bruce H Grahn, C. W. Hamm, Cecil P. Moore, Kristina Narfström

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Ophthalmology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Macular Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinoschisisOphthalmologyElectroretinographyOptical coherence tomographyRetinalMedicineRetinaRetinal DisorderOphthalmoscopyRetinal detachmentOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 11-year-old neutered male Labrador retriever-cross dog was presented to the University of Missouri-Columbia Veterinary Ophthalmology Service for subtle visual deficits. Indirect ophthalmoscopy revealed a smooth, bullous elevation in the superior-temporal retina OU. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) performed OU showed inner retinal separation consistent with retinoschisis. Electroretinography (ERG) revealed markedly reduced b-wave amplitudes in the more severely affected eye (OD) compared with the less severely affected eye (OS). The most notable reductions were in the rod response and 30-Hz flicker b-waves OD which were approximately 50% of the corresponding amplitudes OS. Implicit times, particularly the a-wave implicit times, were noticeably longer OD compared with OS. Lesions remained unchanged over 4 months at which time the dog was humanely euthanized for reasons unrelated to the ocular disease. Significant light microscopic ocular findings were bilateral superior temporal peripheral retinoschisis. The separation of the retinal tissue was similar between eyes and effectively divided the outer plexiform layer. In addition, thinning of the surrounding retinal layers was present. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of canine retinoschisis diagnosed with OCT, evaluated with electroretinography, and confirmed with light microscopic examination. History, clinical, and diagnostic findings, with the absence of disease progression over time, are analogous with cases of acquired senile retinoschisis in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary OphthalmologySame topicRetinal and Macular SurgeryFrench-language works237,207