MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790585628 · doi:10.1071/aseg2018abt5_2b

Ungani Oil Field, Canning Basin - Evaluation of a Dolomite Reservoir

2018· article· en· W2790585628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsAlberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority
FundersCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
KeywordsPorosityDolomiteGeologyDrillingOil fieldCasingMineralogyCharacterisation of pore space in soilWell loggingEffective porosityPetroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core supported study of the heterogeneous Ungani dolomite reservoir architecture is driving development drilling and upgrades to field resource estimates. Vuggy connected and macro non-connected pore space was directly measured over a 70m continuous core using 3D structural analysis of CT-scans. Plug density measurements indicate non-connected or sub-140 micron resolution contribution of around 1% to 2.5% (pu) for the tight matrix, but all remaining porosity potentially contributes to oil production. The high resolution core porosity data is vertically repositioned and upscaled to calibrate neutron-density and sonic petrophysically derived porosities which are inadequate to resolve productive zones using conventional reservoir cut-offs. Conditioned resistivity image data correlated exceptionally with directly measured connected porosities. Reservoir properties were extrapolated to all wells across the Ungani field giving field net/gross estimates of up to 63% and porosities over 30% pu in some vuggy and brecciaed zones. The heterogeneity and prolific nature of the uppermost 17m of reservoir had not been previously recognised due to poor log data coverage and access at the casing points. Recent re-analysis of this section at Ungani-3 with Chemostrat ICP-OES-MS analysis of ditch cuttings was instrumental in proposing additional drilling to re-target this zone. Mineralogy analysis is used to calculate rock grain densities and help calibrate neutron-density derived porosity logs over the Ungani field. Up-scaled core porosity correlates well with density and sonic porosity logs. Resistivity logs adjusted for minerology can also be used to predict porosity and support the use of resistivity image logs to identify vuggy zones and estimate porosity at a higher resolution than conventional logging tools. A field static model was populated with three facies distributed over vertical zones according to the distribution encountered in the core porosity analysis and well logs, and iteratively matched to the dynamic pressure data and field production history which exhibits field scale multi-Darcy horizontal permeability and protection from vertical water cut. Further drilling and downhole artificial lift is planned to extend field production rates to 3000 bbls/day. Increased confidence in this regionally developed reservoir is supporting further exploration of undrilled prospects in this immature and under-explored trend

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it