MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790647004 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.200

A200 THE USE OF CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF IRON DEFICIENCY ANEMIA- A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

2018· article· en· W2790647004 on OpenAlexaffabout
James Stone, Kanika Grover, C N Bernstein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal and GI Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCapsule endoscopyIron-deficiency anemiaAnemiaColonoscopyGastroenterologyInternal medicineFerritinIron deficiencyHemoglobinGastrointestinal bleedingEndoscopySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many patients who present with undiagnosed iron deficiency anemia (IDA) are presumed to have occult gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding as the cause. When investigations include a negative upper endoscopy and colonoscopy, a negative celiac antibody screen and there is no obvious GI source of blood loss, occult GI bleeding from a small bowel source is considered and capsule endoscopy (CE) is pursued. Recent Canadian Association of Gastroenterology guidelines on the use of CE suggested that CE is indicated in only selected cases of iron deficiency anemia; however, evidence on the yield of CE in IDA and how to optimally select cases is limited. We aimed to examine the yield of CE in diagnosing the cause of IDA and to define clinical parameters that predict higher diagnostic yields 1351 individuals underwent CE in Manitoba between the years of 2005–2016. All studies were reported by one reading physician and all requisitions included demographics and requested information on medication use, prior imaging studies, and hemoglobin and ferritin levels. 620 (46%) CE was indicated for occult GI bleeding or IDA. Positive findings on CE were separated into ‘definite’ and ‘possible’. Descriptive statistics are reported and multinomial regression analysis was used to determine the variables correlated with definite CE findings. Of the 620 included subjects, mean age was 62.9 years, and mean hemoglobin was 89 g/L and mean ferritin was 32 uMol/L. 210 (33.9%) had positive findings (definite; 23%, possible;10.8%). 107 (17.2%) of all patients were taking ASA, 31 (5%) were on an antiplatelet agent, and 33 (5.3%) on an anticoagulant. Vascular ectasias were the majority of definite findings (47.5%). Predictors of definite findings were age (relative risk (RR) 1.04; 95% CI 1.02–1.06) and male sex (RR 1.88; 95%CI 1.25–2.83). None of serum Hg or ferritin, rural vs urban residence, number of prior upper or lower endoscopies, prior small bowel enteroscopy, use of ASA, antiplatelet, anticoagulant or PPI medications predicted a positive CE. To our knowledge, this is the largest study examining the use of CE in iron deficiency anemia and occult GI bleeding. The diagnostic yield of 33.9% and more importantly 23% for definite lesions is within the range of previously reported yields. Within this cohort, age and male sex are predictors of definite findings on CE. Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants did not predict positive findings in our study. Further research is needed to determine which findings lead to interventions that positively impact on patient outcomes None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicEsophageal and GI PathologyFrench-language works237,207