A169 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ELUXADOLINE IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME WITH DIARRHEA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) is characterized by abdominal pain and diarrhea and can affect people of all ages. Eluxadoline (ELX) is approved for the treatment of IBS-D in Canada, the U.S., and the E.U., based on Phase 3 trials in which it simultaneously improved abdominal pain and stool consistency. To examine the efficacy and safety of ELX in patients aged <65 and ≥65 years in a post hoc analysis of Phase 3 clinical trials. Two Phase 3 clinical trials randomized patients meeting Rome III criteria for IBS-D to twice-daily (BID) treatment with ELX (75 or 100 mg) or placebo for 26 weeks. Patients rated worst abdominal pain (0–10), stool consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale [BSFS]; 1–7), and global symptom score (GSS; 0–4) daily. Patients with a decrease in abdominal pain (≥30%) and improvement in stool consistency (BSFS <5) on the same day for ≥50% of days were considered composite responders. A GSS score of 0 or 1 or an improvement of ≥2.0 indicated a GSS response. Overall, 9.9% of patients were aged ≥65 years. Significantly more patients aged <65 and ≥65 years were composite responders at both ELX doses compared to placebo (Table). The proportion of abdominal pain responders was significant only for patients <65 years, while the proportion of stool consistency responders was significantly greater than placebo at both ELX doses in both age groups (Table). In patients ≥65 years, only ELX 75 mg was associated with a significantly higher proportion of GSS responders vs. placebo. Among patients aged ≥65 years, the responder rate for each of these endpoints was greater with ELX 75 mg compared to ELX 100 mg. The proportion of patients with ≥1 adverse event was slightly higher among patients aged ≥65 years compared to younger patients (66.2% vs. 59.7% and 65.3% vs. 57.5% of patients receiving ELX 75 or 100 mg, respectively). In patients <65 years, constipation occurred in 7.3% and 8.4% of patients receiving ELX 75 or 100 mg, respectively, compared to 9.2% and 10.7% in patients ≥65. Of six total cases of pancreatitis, one occurred in a patient aged ≥65 years. ELX improved IBS-D symptoms in patients aged <65 and ≥65 years. While the data are limited by sample size, in patients aged ≥65 years, the lower approved ELX dose of 75 mg BID was associated with a greater response rate than the 100 mg BID dose. Hence, the lower approved dose is recommended for this population. †Patients with simultaneous abdominal pain and stool consistency response on ≥50% of days *p<0.05 vs. placebo; **p<0.005 vs. placebo; ***p<0.001 vs. placebo Allergan plc
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".