MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790650564 · doi:10.4095/285614

The Flin Flon 3D Knowledge Cube

2010· report· en· W2790650564 on OpenAlexaff
Ernst Schetselaar, S. Pehrsson, C Devine, M Currie, Don White, M. Malinowski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCube (algebra)BusinessComputer scienceMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 3D geologic model of the Flin Flon exploration camp has been compiled from integrated analyses of drill core, 2D and 3D seismic, mine survey and geological map data. The 3D model is built from a series of lithostratigraphic and fault surfaces which are, together with their underpinning drill hole and map constraints, represented in a '3D knowledge cube'. The geometry and attitude of the 3D lithostratigraphic surfaces, and their topological relationships with multiple generations of shear zones and thrust faults, suggest that the Flin Flon exploration camp is underlain by an E-dipping stack of W-vergent thrust imbricates formed by post- and possibly pre-Missi deformation events. The imbricate stack was subsequently deformed by trending ductile thrust faults that internally imbricated the Flin Flon arc assemblage and Missi sedimentary rocks and brought up rocks of the former against the latter in a northerly direction. The VMS-hosting Millrock member has been stacked on at least four structural levels, enhancing the VMS potential in the footwall and hanging wall vicinities of the known ore deposits where both thrust systems intersect. N-trending post-metamorphic subvertical faults have further segmented the polyphase imbricate stack, complicating the correlation of lithostratigraphic successions across them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemantic Web and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207