The carotid chemoreceptor contributes to the elevated arterial stiffness and vasoconstrictor outflow in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key points The reason(s) for the increased central arterial stiffness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are not well understood. In this study, we inhibited the carotid chemoreceptor with both low‐dose dopamine and hyperoxia, and observed a decrease in central arterial stiffness and muscle sympathetic nervous activity in COPD patients, while no change was observed in age‐ and risk‐matched controls. Carotid chemoreceptor inhibition increased vascular conductance, secondary to reduced arterial blood pressure in COPD patients. Findings from the current study suggest that elevated carotid chemoreceptor activity may contribute to the increased arterial stiffness typically observed in COPD patients. Abstract Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients have increased central arterial stiffness and muscle sympathetic nervous activity (MSNA), both of which contribute to cardiovascular (CV) dysfunction and increased CV risk. Previous work suggests that COPD patients have elevated carotid chemoreceptor (CC) activity/sensitivity, which may contribute to the elevated MSNA and arterial stiffness. Accordingly, the effect of CC inhibition on central arterial stiffness, MSNA and CV function at rest in COPD patients was examined in a randomized placebo‐controlled study. Thirteen mild–moderate COPD patients (forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) predicted ± SD: 83 ± 18%) and 13 age‐ and risk‐matched controls completed resting CV function measurements with either i.v. saline or i.v. dopamine (2 μg kg −1 min −1 ) while breathing normoxic or hyperoxic air (100% O 2 ). On a separate day, a subset of COPD patients and controls completed MSNA measurements while breathing normoxic or hyperoxic air. Arterial stiffness was determined by pulse‐wave velocity (PWV) and MSNA was measured by microneurography. Brachial blood flow was determined using Doppler ultrasound, cardiac output was estimated by impedance cardiography, and vascular conductance was calculated as flow/mean arterial pressure (MAP). CC inhibition with dopamine decreased central and peripheral PWV, and MAP ( P < 0.05) while increasing vascular conductance in COPD. No change in CV function was observed with dopamine in controls. CC inhibition with hyperoxia decreased peripheral PWV and MSNA ( P < 0.05) in COPD, while no change was observed in controls. CC inhibition decreased PWV and MSNA, and improved vascular conductance in COPD, suggesting that tonic CC activity is elevated at rest and contributes to the elevated arterial stiffness in COPD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".