MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2790694239 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.246

A245 THE ROLE OF P53 ON P2Y6R EXPRESSION IN COLORECTAL CANCER.

2018· article· en· W2790694239 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline M. Molle, Guillaume Arguin, Morgane Placet, Fernand‐Pierre Gendron

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMessenger RNAGene isoformColorectal cancerGeneCancer researchMutantGene expressionOncogeneCancerGeneticsCell cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The G protein-coupled P2Y6 receptor (P2Y6R) is activated by extracellular UDP. In the colonic epithelium, it participates in the maintenance of the hydric balance by regulating NaCl secretion. More recently, P2Y6R activity was reported to worsen inflammatory symptoms in a mouse model of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Long-term IBD-suffering patients are at higher risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC). In response to chronic exposure to inflammatory stressors, p53 is one of the first mutated oncogene, which leads to colitis-associated CRC. We focused on the potential role of p53 in the regulation of P2Y6R expression in CRC. The hypothesis is that the presence of a mutant form of p53 will differentially regulate P2Y6R expression as compared to the wild-type protein. The general aim of our work is to characterize the molecular mechanisms associated with p53-dependent regulation of P2Y6R in CRC. More specifically, we will 1) determine and characterize the P2RY6 promoter in cancerous intestinal epithelial cells (cIEC) and 2) study the role of wild-type or mutant p53 on P2Y6R expression. The P2RY6 gene encodes for 8 messenger RNA (mRNA) variants. Most of them are encoding for the P2Y6R isoform 1 which is well characterized. However, mRNA variant 9 codes for an uncharacterized form of the receptor: isoform 2. We used 5’RACE experiments to identify the different transcription start sites (TSS) corresponding to the several mRNA variants and determined the amount of each variant in cIECs. We then cloned four consensus regions (R1, R2, R3 and R4) of the P2RY6 promoter encompassing the four previously identified TSS upstream of the luciferase reporter gene in the pGL4.10 vector. The pGL4.10-P2RY6 promoter constructs were cotransfected with wild-type p53 and mutant forms and transcription activity measured by luciferase assays. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were used to confirm the luciferase results. We identified four TSS in the P2RY6 promoter region and showed that Caco-2 cells expressed predominantly mRNA variant 9. Using luciferase assays, we showed that wild-type p53 can activate the promoter R1 and R4 regions, whereas p53 R273H mutant (p53R273H) has no effect on the transcriptional activity of the R1 region but significantly stimulated the R4 promoter region. The ChIP experiments showed that p53R273H could occupy the R4 but not the R1 region; whereas wild-type p53 could bind both R1 and R4 regions. Finally, AlphaScreen Surefire assays suggest that UDP also activates P2Y6R isoform 2. We showed that wild-type p53 and p53R273H mutant differently regulate P2Y6R expression in cIEC. Hence, p53R273H mutant seems to favor the expression of P2Y6R isoform 2 for which the function is not yet identified but are likely linked to stimulation of cell proliferation and resistance to apoptosis. CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→