MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790715683 · doi:10.1002/chem.201705818

Metallothermic Reduction of Silica Nanoparticles to Porous Silicon for Drug Delivery Using New and Existing Reductants

2018· article· en· W2790715683 on OpenAlexafffund
Yiqi Lai, Jonathan R. Thompson, Mita Dasog

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsPorosityMelting pointChemical engineeringReducing agentPorous siliconMaterials scienceNanoparticleMetalMorphology (biology)Drug deliveryChemistryNanotechnologyMetallurgyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the influence of metals (Mg, Al, and Ca) and reaction conditions (time, temperature, and metal grain size) on the metallothermic reduction of Stöber silica nanoparticles (NPs) to form porous Si has been explored. Mg metal was found to be an effective reducing agent even at temperatures below its melting point; however, it also induced a high degree of structural damage and morphology change. Al was effective in reducing silica NPs only at its melting point or above, but the resulting particles retained a higher degree of structural morphology as compared to those reduced using Mg. Ca was found to be ineffective in reducing silica. A new reductant, a mixture of 70 % Mg and 30 % Al, was found to induce the least amount of morphology change, and the reactions proceeded at a temperature (450 °C) lower than those required with Mg or Al individually. Furthermore, porous Si NPs obtained using Mg, Al, and the mixture of 70 % Mg and 30 % Al as reductants have been investigated as carriers for ibuprofen loading and release. Porous Si obtained from reductions with Mg and the Mg/Al mixture showed higher drug loading and a sustained drug release profile, whereas porous Si obtained from Al reduction had lower loading and showed a conventional release profile over 24 h.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207