MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790745932 · doi:10.1177/154431671403800102

Impact of a Structured Duplex Ultrasound Hemodialysis Access Surveillance Program on Access Intervention Rates

2014· article· en· W2790745932 on OpenAlexaff
Sanjoy Kundu, Milad Modabber, Brandon Chiu, John M. You, Mitra Moazzami, Rob Babcock

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for Vascular Ultrasound · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityThe Scarborough Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuplex (building)HemodialysisHemodialysis accessMedicineIntervention (counseling)UltrasoundVascular accessRadiologyInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose —To assess the impact of a structured duplex ultrasound hemodialysis access surveillance program on the frequency of diagnostic fistulograms and endovascular interventions. Methods —A structured ultrasound hemodialysis access surveillance program was implemented at our institution on March 1, 2010. The access ultrasound comprised the measurement of vessel diameter, velocity, and flow in the feeding artery, anastomosis, and at specific points along the outflow vein (2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 cm beyond anastomosis) along with a waveform pattern in the ipsilateral axillary and internal jugular vein. In this retrospective multicenter study, we compared the frequency of diagnostic contrast fistulograms and endovascular interventions (angioplasty) performed from March 2010 to February 2011 (12 months) by using the implemented ultrasound access surveillance program (postsurveillance) to the preceding 12 month period (March 2009 to February 2010) where no ultrasound access surveillance program was used (pre-surveillance). Results —Within our hemodialysis program, there was an average of 119 active fistulae during the presurveillance period versus 141 in the postsurveillance period. There were no significant demographic differences in our study populations across the two time frames ( p > 0.05). In the presurveillance period, 59 diagnostic contrast fistulograms were performed, whereas 47 diagnostic contrast fistulograms were performed during the post surveillance period. Using a two-sample test for equality of proportions, we found there was a significant decrease in the proportion of diagnostic contrast fistulograms after implementation of an access ultrasound surveillance program ( p = 0.0114). Similarly, 81 endovascular interventions were performed during the presurveillance period, whereas a significantly decreased number of endovascular interventions (n = 50) were performed postsurveillance ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions —There was a significant decrease in the number of invasive diagnostic contrast fistulograms and endovascular interventions upon implementation of an ultrasound access surveillance program. Such a structured surveillance program has the potential to provide significant reduction in patient discomfort and to minimize unnecessary invasive endovascular procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.398 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for Vascular UltrasoundSame topicCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisFrench-language works237,207