MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2790751478 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.175

A174 A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF CO-PRESCRIBING DIFECT ACTING ANTIVIRALS WITH HMG-COA REDUCTASE INHIBITORS IN HEPATITIS C INFECTED PATIENTS IN A VIRAL HEPATITIS CLINIC

2018· review· en· W2790751478 on OpenAlexaffabout
L DeVreese, Pierre Giguère, Curtis Cooper

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityMedicineStatinInternal medicineHepatitis CCombination therapyHepatitis C virusConcomitantRetrospective cohort studyPharmacotherapyAdverse effectVirologyVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) therapy for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) has led to improvements in the efficacy, safety and tolerability of HCV management. However, managing drug-drug interactions between NS5A inhibitors and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) remains a challenge in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of either continuing or discontinuing statins while on NS5A-based DAA therapy. By retrospectively evaluating statin use in our HCV clinic patients, we aspired to gain a better appreciation of how to safely manage patients presenting on concomitant therapy. A retrospective chart review at The Ottawa Hospital Viral Hepatitis Program’s clinic was performed to 1) assess the number of statin-treated patients on NS5A inhibitor based HCV treatment and 2) to assess the safety and tolerability of either continuing or discontinuing statins while on NS5A inhibitor DAA therapy, measured by the incidence of statin related myopathies and vascular events. 29/165 (17.8%) of patients pursing NS5A inhibitor therapy presented on a statin at baseline. Six out of 29 (20.7%) discontinued their statin prior to treatment, 10/29 (34.5%) continued on baseline doses and 13/29 (44.8%) were on a decreased dose. All patients on co-therapy were on low doses of statins with none exceeding 25% of the suggested maximum daily statin dose. During co-therapy, one patient experienced stomach cramping and no patients discontinued their statin during DAA therapy. Of those discontinuing statins prior to starting treatment, no patients developed vascular complications. One patient remaining on statin therapy suffered a myocardial infarction. Although prescribing practices were not uniform, the majority of patients on a baseline statin were continued on statin therapy throughout NS5A inhibitor-based HCV therapy. Co-administration of low-dose statins with NS5A inhibitors appeared to be well tolerated resulting in no apparent or serious statin-related adverse effects, despite the theoretical risk for DDIs. While co-therapy was reassuringly well tolerated, practitioners must continue to weigh the benefits and risks of co-administering statin therapy on a case-by-case basis. The addition of larger, prospective studies may help to better characterize the implications of pursuing co-therapy and provide further guidance to clinicians managing these complex patients. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicHepatitis C virus research→French-language works237,207→