MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790812160 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v42i04a04

Interim Recommendations for the Reporting of Extensively Drug Resistant and Pan Drug Resistant Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp. And Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

2016· article· en· W2790812160 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
GJ German, FB Jamieson, Matthew W. Gilmour, Huda Almohri, James M. Bullard, MC Domingo, Jeffrey Fuller, Gabriel Girouard, David Haldane, Linda Hoang, P N Levett, Jean Longtin, Roberto G. Melano, Robert Needle, SN Patel, Anu Rebbapragada, RC Reyes, M. R. Mulvey

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInfections and bacterial resistance
Canadian institutionsBrampton Civic HospitalQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreDr. Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital CentreProvincial Laboratory of Public HealthSaskatchewan Disease Control LaboratoryInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecSt. John’s Health Sciences CentreHealth PEIManitoba Beekeepers' AssociationToronto Public HealthBC Centre for Disease ControlPublic Health Ontario
FundersUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University
KeywordsStenotrophomonas maltophiliaPseudomonas aeruginosaMicrobiologyDrug resistanceInterimMulti drug resistantAcinetobacterEnterobacteriaceaeAcinetobacter baumanniiBiologyMedicineAntibioticsEscherichia coliBacteriaGeographyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.133
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.227
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1330.227
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.007
Bibliometrics0.0150.012
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0160.005
Research integrity0.0300.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicInfections and bacterial resistanceFrench-language works237,207