MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790872195 · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12978

Net displacement and temporal scaling: Model fitting, interpretation and implementation

2018· article· en· W2790872195 on OpenAlexaff
Garrett M. Street, Tal Avgar, Luca Börger

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in Ecology and Evolution · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalingScale (ratio)Scale invarianceRandom walkMathematicsTortuosityPower lawDisplacement (psychology)Statistical physicsStatisticsGeologyGeographyGeometryCartographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Net displacement is an integral component of numerous ecological processes and is critically dependent on the tortuosity of a movement trajectory and hence on the temporal scale of observation. Numerous attempts have been made to quantitatively describe net displacement while accommodating tortuosity, typically evoking a power law, but scale‐dependency in tortuosity limits the utility of approaches based on power law relationships that must assume scale‐invariant tortuosity. We describe a phenomenological model of net displacement that permits both scale‐variant and scale‐invariant movement. Movement trajectories are divided into pairs of relocations specifying start‐ and end‐points, and net displacements between points are calculated across a vector of time intervals. A bootstrap is implemented to create new datasets that are independent both across and within time intervals, and the model is fitted to the bootstrapped dataset using log–log regression. We apply this model to simulated trajectories and both fine‐grain and coarse‐grain trajectories obtained from an Aldabra giant tortoise Aldabrachelys gigantea , African elephants Loxodonta africana , black‐backed jackals Canis mesomelas and Northern elephant seals Mirounga angustirostris . The model was able to quantify the characteristics of net displacement from simulated movement trajectories corresponding to both scale‐variant (e.g. correlated random walks) and scale‐invariant (e.g. random walk) movement models. Furthermore, the model produced identical outputs across time vectors corresponding to different intervals and absolute ranges of time for scale‐invariant models. The model characterized the tortoise as generally exhibiting long scale‐invariant steps, which was corroborated by visual comparison of model outputs to observed trajectories. Elephants, jackals and seals exhibited movement parameters consistent with their known movement behaviours (nomadism, territoriality and widely ranging searching). We describe how the model may be used to compare movements within and between species, for example by partitioning movement into scale‐variant and scale‐invariant components, and by calculating a unitless net displacement scaled to the basal movement capacities of an animal. We also identify several useful derived quantities and realistic parameter ranges and discuss how the model may be implemented in a variety of ecological studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in Ecology and EvolutionSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207