MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790946053 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v42i07a03

Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization’s Updated Recommendations on Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: Nine-valent HPV vaccine and clarification of minimum intervals between doses in the HPV immunization schedule

2016· article· en· W2790946053 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
MC Tunis, SL Deeks

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsMedicineImmunizationVaccinationHPV vaccinesAdvisory committeeGardasilHuman papillomavirusHuman papillomavirus vaccineFamily medicineGenital wartsRoutine immunizationGynecologyHPV infectionImmunologyCervical cancerInternal medicineCancerImmune systemPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: 9, Merck Canada Inc.) was authorized for use in Canada for the prevention of HPV types 6-, 11-, 16-, 18-, 31-, 33-, 45-, 52- and 58-related cancers and anogenital warts (AGW) in females aged 9 to 45 years and males aged 9 to 26 years. OBJECTIVES: To summarize evidence on the new HPV9 vaccine and make recommendations for its use in Canada, to review epidemiological data on the relative contribution to disease outcomes of the 5 additional genotypes covered in the HPV9 vaccine, and to clarify acceptable minimum intervals between vaccine doses in either a 2-dose or 3-dose HPV immunization schedule. METHODS: The NACI HPV working group performed literature reviews on the topics of HPV vaccine minimum dose intervals, and the HPV9 vaccine. Vaccine manufacturers provided additional data for review. All evidence was reviewed, rated, and a representative dataset for each trial was reported in evidence tables. A knowledge synthesis was performed, and NACI approved specific evidence-based recommendations, elucidating the rationale and relevant considerations. RESULTS: In terms of the HPV immunization schedule, there is a paucity of published evidence supporting shortened or flexible minimum intervals for HPV vaccines, compared to ample evidence endorsing the recommended schedules as well as evidence supporting delays in the receipt of booster doses. Assumptions about the immunogenicity and efficacy of shortened 'flexibility range' minimum dose intervals rely heavily on the manufacturer's unpublished data on file and their Health Canada-approved recommendations included in the product monographs. The NACI recommendations and evidence grades based on these results are included below. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 strains that can be covered by other HPV vaccines, the HPV9 vaccine is expected to provide further protection by preventing infection and disease related to HPV types 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58. Protecting against these additional strains may prevent up to an additional 14% of anogenital cancers and up to 30% of high-risk precancerous cervical lesions in Canada. Efforts should be made to administer HPV vaccines at the recommended intervals. When an abbreviated schedule is required, minimum intervals between HPV vaccine doses should be met including a minimum interval of 24 weeks between the first and last dose in either a 2-dose or 3-dose schedule.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207