MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790965545 · doi:10.1139/cjm-2018-0056

PmpI antibody reduces the inhibitory effect of Vp1 on <i>Chlamydia trachomatis</i> infectivity

2018· article· en· W2790965545 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jie Ren, Tingting Lian, Lili Shao, Yuanjun Liu, Quanzhong Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChlamydia trachomatisInfectivityVirologyBiologyMicrobiologyPolyclonal antibodiesBacterial outer membraneCapsidWestern blotAntibodyVirusChlamydiaceaeSerotypeChlamydiaImmunologyEscherichia coliBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common cause of bacterial sexually transmitted infections. The effect of antibiotic treatment is not satisfactory, and there is currently no vaccine to prevent C. trachomatis infection. Our results showed that Chlamydia virus CPG1 capsid protein Vp1 treatment significantly inhibited C. trachomatis growth in cell culture, and the inclusion numbers of different C. trachomatis serotypes were decreased. In addition, we conducted a preliminary investigation of the possible mechanisms behind the Vp1 inhibition effects and the C. trachomatis molecules targeted by Vp1. Using far-western blot and GST pull-down assay, we found that purified Vp1 can bind to the C. trachomatis outer membrane protein PmpI. PmpI polyclonal antibody treatment markedly reduced the inhibitory effect of Vp1 on C. trachomatis infectivity. On the basis of these experimental results, we infer that PmpI participates in the inhibitory effect of Vp1 and may be a potential receptor of Vp1 in the outer membrane of C. trachomatis. Our research provides clues regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying the interactions between chlamydia virus and chlamydia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207