MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791032399 · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.6701

Interferometric metrology of photomask blanks:

2000· report· en· W2791032399 on OpenAlexaff
C. J. Evans, Angela Davies, Robert E. Parks, L-Z Shao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsCentennial College
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryNational Institute of Standards and Technology
KeywordsPhotomaskMetrologyInterferometryOpticsComputer scienceEngineering drawingEngineeringComputer graphics (images)Materials scienceNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preliminary analyses of three optical configurations for measurement of photomask blanks are described. A simple variant of the well known Ritchey-Common test should allow front surface, as-chucked flatness to be measured using current, commercially available phase measuring interferometers. Taking advantage of particular features of a special purpose interferometer installed at NIST, additional information may be obtained from two other test configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207