MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2791096698 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.161

A161 EVALUATING THE DIFFERENCES IN PERCEIVED STRESS AMONG NON-INFLAMMATORY AND INFLAMMATORY IBD FLARES

2018· article· en· W2791096698 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laura E. Targownik, John R. Walker, Matthew T. Bernstein, Kathryn A. Sexton, Çharles N. Bernstein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCalprotectinInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineDiseaseInflammationMoodPerceived Stress ScaleGastroenterologyClinical psychologyStress (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence and severity of symptoms in IBD correlate poorly with the degree of inflammatory activity, especially in Crohn’s disease (CD). Psychological factors, including perceived stress and mood disruption are associated with symptom activity. This relationship is bidirectional with increased symptoms predicting later increased perceived stress and vice versa. It is unclear whether the association between high perceived stress and active symptoms is weighted more towards high perceived stress being associated with symptomatic activity in individuals and no concurrent active inflammation than it would be in persons with increased symptoms and evidence of intestinal inflammation. To evaluate whether perceived stress is associated with increased symptoms in non-inflammatory versus inflammatory IBD flares. We recruited 487 persons from the University of Manitoba IBD registry to assess the relationship between intestinal inflammation, symptomatic disease activity, and psychologic factors. Disease activity was assessed using the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) for CD and the Powell Tuck Index (PTI) for UC. Perceived stress was measured using the Cohen Perceived Stress (CPSS) scale with high scores defined as ≥ 20. A fecal calprotectin (FCAL) level >250ug/g was the cut point for active inflammation. An inflammatory flare was defined as a FCAL > 250ug/g and disease index >4. A non-inflammatory flare was defined as FCAL ≤250 and disease activity index >4. Completed surveys and stool samples were submitted at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. For CD (n=265), 31 (11.7%) were in an inflammatory flare at baseline while 55 (20.8%) were in a non-inflammatory flare. For UC (n=222) 32 (14.4%) were in an inflammatory flare while 39 (17.6%) were in a non-inflammatory flare. There was no significant difference in the likelihood of having a high CPSS score between those with inflammatory vs non-inflammatory flares either at baseline or at 6 months(Table 1). There were no differences in the scores on individual items in the CPSS score between persons in inflammatory flares versus those in non-inflammatory flares. Increased perceived stress is equally associated with increased symptoms with persons with IBD regardless of the presence of inflammatory activity. Table 1. Clinical Scores None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→