The Natural History of Cranial Morphology in Sagittal Craniosynostosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children with craniosynostosis have abnormal head shapes. Parents frequently ask whether the abnormal head shape will get worse with time. However, there is no information in the literature to indicate whether the deformity gets worse. OBJECTIVE: To assess the progression of cranial morphology in children with unoperated craniosynostosis. METHODS: A retrospective review of all children with unoperated sagittal craniosynostosis who were referred to the Craniofacial Clinic at the Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) was conducted. Serial 3D photographs of patients with sagittal craniosynostosis who have not undergone surgical correction were included in the study. There were 14 cases included, with 9 males and 5 females. Ages at time of scans ranged from 3 months to 5 years of age (mean = 28.3 months, SD = 28.2 months). Nine patients had the first scan at age of <12 months. Multiple scans for each patient were sized for volume over time and compared with a normative skull database. RESULTS: The results of measuring skull volume changes over time revealed no significant difference from infants without craniosynostosis. Furthermore, there cranial index was stable over time in patients with craniosynostosis. CONCLUSION: The severity of craniosynostosis does not worsen or improve with time. Parents having difficulty in deciding to proceed with surgical correction of craniosynostosis can be reassured that the skull deformity will remain stable with the growth of their child if they decide not to proceed with surgical correction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".