MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791119267 · doi:10.5565/rev/da.187

El bienestar de los animales: un nuevo principio general y constitucional de Derecho comunitario. Sentencia Jippes, TJCE, 2001

2012· article· es· W2791119267 on OpenAlexaff
Sabine Brels

Bibliographic record

VenueDerecho Animal Forum of Animal Law Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnimal Law and Welfare
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrincipal (computer security)European unionLawPolitical scienceDirectiveMember statesWelfarePreliminary rulingEuropean communityWelfare economicsEconomic JusticeBusinessEconomicsInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decision "Jippes", returned by the ECJ in 2001, concerned a dispute relating to the FMD epidemic in Europe. To stop the spread of the disease, the European Union (EU) became an EU directive banning the use of vaccinations and imposed mandatory demolition of livestock. The principal applicant, Ms Jippes, owns the farm animals who refuses to kill stating that the EU spent a general principle of law on animal welfare that protected the animals from the physical pain and suffering except in case of need. In this sense, the policy that would prohibit and impose preventive vaccination required the demolition would be in direct conflict with this principle. However, the ECJ rejected this argument stating that the welfare of animals is not a general principle of Community law and concludes at the end of the validity of the measures against FMD

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDerecho Animal Forum of Animal Law StudiesSame topicAnimal Law and WelfareFrench-language works237,207