MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791128465 · doi:10.1002/2017jc013527

Isotopic Evidence for the Evolution of Subsurface Nitrate in the Western Equatorial Pacific

2018· article· en· W2791128465 on OpenAlexaff
Nadine Lehmann, Julie Granger, Markus Kienast, Kevin Brown, Patrick A. Rafter, Gema Martínez Méndez, Mahyar Mohtadi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpwellingBiogeochemical cycleOceanographyRemineralisationThermoclineGeologyδ13CNitrateNutrientDissolved organic carbonStable isotope ratioEnvironmental chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Subsurface waters from both hemispheres converge in the Western Equatorial Pacific (WEP), some of which form the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) that influences equatorial Pacific productivity across the basin. Measurements of nitrogen (N) and oxygen (O) isotope ratios in nitrate (δ 15 N NO3 and δ 18 O NO3 ), the isotope ratios of dissolved inorganic carbon (δ 13 C DIC ), and complementary biogeochemical tracers reveal that northern and southern WEP waters have distinct biogeochemical histories. Organic matter remineralization plays an important role in setting the nutrient characteristics on both sides of the WEP. However, remineralization in the northern WEP contributes a larger concentration of the nutrients, consistent with the older “age” of northern thermocline‐depth and intermediate‐depth waters. Remineralization introduces a relatively low δ 15 N NO3 to northern waters, suggesting the production of sinking organic matter by N 2 fixation at the surface—consistent with the notion that N 2 fixation is quantitatively important in the North Pacific. In contrast, remineralization contributes elevated δ 15 N NO3 to the southern WEP thermocline, which we hypothesize to derive from the vertical flux of high‐δ 15 N material at the southern edge of the equatorial upwelling. This signal potentially masks any imprint of N 2 fixation from South Pacific waters. The observations further suggest that the intrusion of high δ 15 N NO3 and δ 18 O NO3 waters from the eastern margins is more prominent in the northern than southern WEP. Together, these north‐south differences enable the examination of the hemispheric inputs to the EUC, which appear to derive predominantly from southern hemisphere waters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research OceansSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207