Asymptotic zero distribution of random orthogonal polynomials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider random polynomials of the form $H_{n}(z)=\sum_{j=0}^{n}\xi_{j}q_{j}(z)$ where the $\{\xi_{j}\}$ are i.i.d. nondegenerate complex random variables, and the $\{q_{j}(z)\}$ are orthonormal polynomials with respect to a compactly supported measure $\tau $ satisfying the Bernstein–Markov property on a regular compact set $K\subset\mathbb{C}$. We show that if $\mathbb{P}(|\xi_{0}|>e^{|z|})=o(|z|^{-1})$, then the normalized counting measure of the zeros of $H_{n}$ converges weakly in probability to the equilibrium measure of $K$. This is the best possible result, in the sense that the roots of $G_{n}(z)=\sum_{j=0}^{n}\xi_{j}z^{j}$ fail to converge in probability to the appropriate equilibrium measure when the above condition on the $\xi_{j}$ is not satisfied. We also consider random polynomials of the form $\sum_{k=0}^{n}\xi_{k}f_{n,k}z^{k}$, where the coefficients $f_{n,k}$ are complex constants satisfying certain conditions, and the random variables $\{\xi_{k}\}$ satisfy $\mathbb{E}\log (1+|\xi_{0}|)<\infty $. In this case, we establish almost sure convergence of the normalized counting measure of the zeros to an appropriate limiting measure. Again, this is the best possible result in the same sense as above.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it