MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791245657 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxy007

A 7-year-old boy with a nonfebrile seizure following a fall

2018· editorial· en· W2791245657 on OpenAlexaff
Dirk E. Bock, Tracy Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2018
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParasitic infections in humans and animals
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A previously healthy 7-year-old boy, who immigrated to Canada from Nicaragua 4 years prior, presented to his local hospital following a generalized tonic-clonic seizure with loss of consciousness at school. Minutes prior to seizure onset, he had hit his head after falling off a jungle gym. He then walked into the school building, where he experienced the seizure. In the Emergency Department, he was intubated for a Glasgow Coma Scale of three. A head computed tomography scan did not confirm the initially suspected intracranial bleed, but reported a left-sided posterior fossa mass. Phenytoin was initiated for seizure protection and the child was transferred to our Paediatric Critical Care Unit. Initial laboratory studies, including a complete blood count and differential, electrolytes, c-reactive protein, liver transaminases and renal and liver function parameters were noncontributory. An electroencephalogram showed excess delta activity, accentuated over the left posterior region, but no epileptiform activity. Further exploration of the medical history revealed that the patient had been experiencing nausea, vomiting, increasing blurry vision and mild headaches for 3 weeks. A 1-month family trip to Nicaragua 3 months prior to presentation was also noted. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head suggested the diagnosis (Figure 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0140.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicParasitic infections in humans and animalsFrench-language works237,207