MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2791369654 · doi:10.1117/12.2290996

Design and fabrication of capacitive micromachined optical focusing deformable MEMS mirrors for ultrafast tunable focusing (Conference Presentation)

2018· article· en· W2791369654 on OpenAlexaff
Afshin Kashani Ilkhechi, Benjamin Greenlay, Christopher Ceroici, Mohammad Maadi, Parsin Haji Reza, Roger J. Zemp

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroelectromechanical systemsMaterials scienceOpticsCapacitive sensingDeformable mirrorBimorphFinite element methodFocal lengthSurface micromachiningRadius of curvatureCurvatureDeflection (physics)OptoelectronicsWavefrontLens (geology)FabricationPhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce Capacitive Micromachined Optical Focusing (CMOF) MEMS consisting of a miniature circular mirrored-membrane which can be electrostatically actuated to change mirror curvature. The central deflection zone is a close approximation to a parabolic mirror. The device is fabricated with minimal membrane mass to be only slightly larger than a diffraction-limited focus of a Gaussian beam. This device is a good candidate for fast tuning of the radius of curvature of laser beams at greater than MHz tuning rates, a feat difficult to achieve with current technologies. We present the design, modeling, and fabrication of a high-speed focusing CMOF MEMS platform. We have developed an equivalent circuit model for CMOFs which is capable of full nonlinear analyze of the CMOFs, and it is validated by ANSYS finite element method (FEM) simulations. By using the equivalent circuit model the non-linear transient response of a CMOF can be rapidly obtained and controlled with nonlinear control systems. The first generation of the proposed device is fabricated with a sacrificial-release process. Fabricated CMOFs have a silicon nitride membrane with 32um radius and 300nm gap spacing between top and bottom electrode. These CMOFs can effectively change their focal length from infinity to 3mm. We tested the device in an optical lens-assembly, and recorded 1mm focal point change by only 100nm deflection on the CMOF surface as measured using a Shack-Hartman wavefront sensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→