Apheresis buffy coat collection without photoactivation has no effect on apoptosis, cell proliferation, and total viability of mononuclear cells collected using photopheresis systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been approved for the treatment of advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma since 1988. While the precise mechanisms resulting in clinical effects are not fully understood, the photoactivation of mononuclear cells (MNCs) using ultraviolet A (UVA) light and methoxsalen is believed to be the predominant initiating process. The effects of MNC passage through the instrument without photoactivation are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of cell processing through the photopheresis instruments on MNCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fourteen healthy male subjects underwent one simulated ECP procedure without reinfusion of buffy coats (BCs) in a two-center, open-label, prospective trial. Baseline peripheral blood BC, apheresis-separated untreated BC (BC1), and photoactivated BC (BC2) were evaluated in culture for viability by dye exclusion, apoptosis by annexin V binding, and cell proliferation response to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) stimulation by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. RESULTS: Photoactivation (BC2) resulted in 88% expression of annexin V by Day 1 of culture compared with 37 and 39% for baseline and untreated BC1. Cell viability by propidium iodide exclusion was reduced to 10% in BC2 on Day 1 versus 65 and 60% for baseline and BC1. The proliferative response to PHA stimulation was 97% inhibited in the photoactivated BC2. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the mechanical processes used for cell separation and processing of the BC in the absence of photoactivation do not induce a significant amount of apoptosis compared to the standard ECP with methoxsalen and UVA photoactivation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".