MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791469162 · doi:10.1117/12.2293429

A novel radiation imaging detector with proportional charge gain

2018· article· en· W2791469162 on OpenAlexaff
Hyunsuk Jang, Karim S. Karim, Denny L. Lee, Ahmet Çamlıca

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Imaging 2018: Physics of Medical Imaging · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric fieldPhysicsDielectricOpticsOptoelectronicsPixelX-ray detectorImage sensorMaterials scienceDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using electric field to partition the selenium layer into a low field charge drift region and a high field avalanche gain region was first proposed in 2005<sup>(1)</sup>. Engineering and fabricating such a grid structure on a TFT array have been a challenge. High dielectric strength material (up to several hundred volts/um) is required. Furthermore, it is very difficult to achieve or control a stable and uniform avalanche gain for imaging without too much excess noise from the elevated grid structure about the pixel plane. Image charge gain is non-­uniform depending on the distance from the center of the avalanche well. A novel coplanar detector structure is now being tested. All image charges collected on a dielectric pixel surface will transfer to the central pixel readout electrode along a converging field. Uniform gain via a stable avalanche process can be achieved. This new structure does not require a conventional TFT platform and higher temperature fabrication process can be used. Imaging charges generated from x‐ray are first directed to a dielectric charge collection interface surface. During the sequential rolling image readout, imaging charges in each line are re-­directed to an orthogonal lines of central readout electrode by a convergent field with high electric field strength at the rim of each pixel central electrode. All accumulated image charges need to pass through the end point of this converging field and therefore undergo a uniform impact ionization charge gain. This gain mechanism is similar to a proportional counter in radiation detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Imaging 2018: Physics of Medical ImagingSame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207