Effects of European common reed on Blanding's turtle spatial ecology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT European common reed ( Phragmites australis ; common reed) is an aggressive invader of North American wetlands that forms homogenous patches and replaces native flora. Dense patches of common reed generally provide poor habitat for many species, although specific effects on at‐risk turtles are largely unknown. We created 3 predictive scenarios to relate the amount of common reed in the landscape to amount of effective habitat for Blanding's turtles ( Emydoidea blandingii ) and investigated the spatial ecology of 46 adult Blanding's turtles using Euclidean distance analysis within 2 wetland complexes in southern Ontario, Canada. At the home‐range scale, we identified a positive association between turtle home ranges and common reed. At the individual scale, turtle radio‐locations were significantly farther from common reed patches than from random points, consistent with the hypothesis that they avoided common reed patches locally. When we analyzed habitat selection by sex, results were similar to population‐level results except for nesting females. During nesting migrations, females did not avoid common reed patches at the individual scale but instead interacted with common reed, potentially placing themselves at risk of being stranded within dense patches. Our results are consistent with our dynamic home range plus saturation hypothesis that invasion of common reed reduces the amount of effective habitat for at‐risk turtles in wetlands because Blanding's turtles significantly avoided common reed patches at individual scales. Management of common reed is an important step to restore habitat for Blanding's turtles and future research is needed to determine best restoration practices. © 2018 The Wildlife Society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".