MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791496984 · doi:10.1097/wnn.0000000000000143

Neuropsychological Profile of a Girl with Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome

2018· article· en· W2791496984 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Miriam Byrne, Tal Schechter, Robyn Westmacott

Bibliographic record

VenueCognitive and Behavioral Neurology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenOntario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWiskott–Aldrich syndromeNeurocognitiveNeuropsychologyPsychologyContext (archaeology)Neuropsychological assessmentCognitive skillPopulationVerbal learningPediatricsCognitionMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the neuropsychological profile of a 6-year-old girl with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, a rare X-linked immunodeficiency disorder associated with thrombocytopenia, eczema, recurrent infections, and malignancy. Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome occurs almost exclusively in males and is extremely rare in females, with no known research focused on cognitive and academic functioning in this population. Our patient was referred due to concerns about her memory and academic functioning. She had a history of progressive thrombocytopenia and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at age 15 months. Standardized measures of intellectual ability, language, visual-spatial and visual-motor skills, attention, memory, and academic achievement were administered. The results showed average to above-average performance in multiple areas of cognitive and academic functioning, with weaknesses in phonological awareness and rapid naming. The advent of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has led to considerable improvement in the long-term prognosis of children with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Although the impact of this syndrome and related conditions on neurocognitive development is presently unknown, this case highlights both the importance of considering base rates for commonly occurring conditions and the significant role neuropsychology can play in identifying cognitive strengths and weaknesses in the context of the developing brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCognitive and Behavioral NeurologySame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207