Expression of C9orf72-related dipeptides impairs motor function in a vertebrate model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large expansions of hexanucleotide GGGGCC (G4C2) repeats (hundreds to thousands) in the first intron of the chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) locus are the strongest known genetic factor associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Different hypotheses exist about the underlying disease mechanism including loss of function by haploinsufficiency, toxicity arising as a result of RNA or dipeptide repeats (DPRs). Five different DPRs are produced by repeat-associated non-ATG-initiated translation of the G4C2 repeats. Though earlier studies have indicated toxicity of the DPRs in worms, flies, primary cultured cells and cell lines, the effect of expressing DPRs of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-relevant length has not been tested on motor behaviour in vertebrate models. In this study, by expressing constructs with alternate codons encoding different lengths of each DPR (40, 200 and 1000) in the vertebrate zebrafish model, the GR DPR was found to lead to the greatest developmental lethality and morphological defects, and GA, the least. However, expressing 1000 repeats of any DPR, including the 'non-toxic' GA DPR led to locomotor defects. Based on these observations, a transgenic line stably expressing 100 GR repeats was generated to allow specific regional and temporal expression of GR repeats in vivo. Expression of GR DPRs ubiquitously resulted in severe morphological defects and reduced swimming. However, when expressed specifically in motor neurons, the developmental defects were significantly reduced, but the swimming phenotype persisted, suggesting that GR DPRs have a toxic effect on motor neuron function. This was validated by the reduction in motor neuron length even in already formed motor neurons when GR was expressed in these. Hence, the expression of C9orf72-associated DPRs can cause significant motor deficits in vertebrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".