Oral Manifestations and Dental Management of Patients with Chronic Renal Failure on Hemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM:The incidence of Chronic renal failure (CRF) is increasing all over the world. Most of these patients will show oral signs or symptoms either related to the renal disease or its treatment. The treatment may require dietary and fluid restrictions but despite this most of the patients progress to end stage renal failure (ESRF) and require further treatment of haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or renal transplantation. This research aims to present the dental manifestations a patient undergoing hemodialysis may present with and also make recommendations for the general dentist to improve their patient's oral hygiene status. METHODOLOGY:Our inclusion criteria included patients suffering from chronic renal failure of either gender with age 18 years and above, non smokers and requiring hemodialysis for at least every month. Whereas,patients with unstable medical conditions requiring hospitalization other than dialysis in the past 30 days, or with co morbidities such as stroke. RESULTS:A comprehensive outline of the different manifestations in the patients undergoing hemodialysis; caries, periodontal disease, halitosis, lichen planus like lesions and xerostomia is discussed in this article along with the number of patients who seroconverted to Hepatitis B and C during the course of their treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with Chronic renal failure presenting with significant medical histories and associated drug regimens, which may considerably affect the oral environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".