MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791625442 · doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.12.005

Perineal Ultrasound: a Review in the Context of Ejaculatory Dysfunction

2018· review· en· W2791625442 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual Medicine Reviews · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrgasmEjaculationMedicineRetrograde ejaculationUrologySexual dysfunctionElectroejaculationPremature ejaculationGynecologySemenPsychologyProstateAnatomyInternal medicineSperm motility

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Ejaculation consists of the emission of semen from seminal vesicles and prostate, followed by expulsion. Ejaculatory dysfunction may take several forms including premature ejaculation, delayed or anejaculation, retrograde ejaculation, and painful ejaculation. Ejaculation is what we can see whereas orgasm is what we feel. The presence of ejaculate does not indicate the ability to experience orgasm. Hence, for the purpose of this work we consider orgasm and ejaculation as 2 separate neurobiological phenomena. AIM: To review the role of advanced investigative techniques such as perineal ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of ejaculation and ejaculatory dysfunction. METHODS: We performed a PubMed search for key words individually and in combination: "ejaculation," "ejaculatory dysfunction," "delayed ejaculation," "painful ejaculation," "retrograde ejaculation," "perineal ultrasound," and "transrectal ultrasound." We also share our local experience using perineal ultrasound in assessing ejaculation. OUTCOMES: Perineal ultrasound can be used as an aid in the investigation of ejaculatory dysfunction. RESULTS: Evaluation of ejaculatory function hinges on a detailed psychosexual history and appropriate physical examination. Function of the ejaculatory center in the spine is androgen dependent; thus, hormonal evaluation is an important aspect of the workup. Disorders of ejaculation and orgasm require evaluation of neuromuscular reflexes activated during sexual activity. Dynamic ultrasonographic (US) ejaculatory-orgasmic studies allow for reproducible and detailed descriptions of the sexual response. Transrectal ejaculatory studies are useful in uncovering reasons for lack of antegrade semen emission, especially in men with poor sperm production or after vasectomy. Dynamic US studies contribute clinical utility in its non-invasive nature and can provide insight to the dynamic processes surrounding pelvic floor functioning in men. CONCLUSIONS: Perineal US for men with delayed ejaculation or anejaculation, painful ejaculation, or retrograde ejaculation may be helpful in select cases. Further research using this modality may help advance our understanding of ejaculatory dysfunction. Forbes CM, Flannigan R, Paduch DA. Perineal Ultrasound: a Review in the Context of Ejaculatory Dysfunction. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:419-428.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it