MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791625442 · doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.12.005

Perineal Ultrasound: a Review in the Context of Ejaculatory Dysfunction

2018· review· en· W2791625442 on OpenAlexaff
Connor M. Forbes, Ryan Flannigan, Darius A. Paduch

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual Medicine Reviews · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrgasmEjaculationMedicineRetrograde ejaculationUrologySexual dysfunctionElectroejaculationPremature ejaculationGynecologySemenPsychologyProstateAnatomyInternal medicineSperm motility

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Ejaculation consists of the emission of semen from seminal vesicles and prostate, followed by expulsion. Ejaculatory dysfunction may take several forms including premature ejaculation, delayed or anejaculation, retrograde ejaculation, and painful ejaculation. Ejaculation is what we can see whereas orgasm is what we feel. The presence of ejaculate does not indicate the ability to experience orgasm. Hence, for the purpose of this work we consider orgasm and ejaculation as 2 separate neurobiological phenomena. AIM: To review the role of advanced investigative techniques such as perineal ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of ejaculation and ejaculatory dysfunction. METHODS: We performed a PubMed search for key words individually and in combination: "ejaculation," "ejaculatory dysfunction," "delayed ejaculation," "painful ejaculation," "retrograde ejaculation," "perineal ultrasound," and "transrectal ultrasound." We also share our local experience using perineal ultrasound in assessing ejaculation. OUTCOMES: Perineal ultrasound can be used as an aid in the investigation of ejaculatory dysfunction. RESULTS: Evaluation of ejaculatory function hinges on a detailed psychosexual history and appropriate physical examination. Function of the ejaculatory center in the spine is androgen dependent; thus, hormonal evaluation is an important aspect of the workup. Disorders of ejaculation and orgasm require evaluation of neuromuscular reflexes activated during sexual activity. Dynamic ultrasonographic (US) ejaculatory-orgasmic studies allow for reproducible and detailed descriptions of the sexual response. Transrectal ejaculatory studies are useful in uncovering reasons for lack of antegrade semen emission, especially in men with poor sperm production or after vasectomy. Dynamic US studies contribute clinical utility in its non-invasive nature and can provide insight to the dynamic processes surrounding pelvic floor functioning in men. CONCLUSIONS: Perineal US for men with delayed ejaculation or anejaculation, painful ejaculation, or retrograde ejaculation may be helpful in select cases. Further research using this modality may help advance our understanding of ejaculatory dysfunction. Forbes CM, Flannigan R, Paduch DA. Perineal Ultrasound: a Review in the Context of Ejaculatory Dysfunction. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:419-428.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexual Medicine ReviewsSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207